Nashville Predators at Winnipeg Jets
Overview Signals
Score
4-3
Final / SO
Shots
23-39
NSH / WPG
Power Play Goals
1-1
NSH / WPG
WPG Shot Edge
+16
Hits -5
The Story
NSH beat WPG 4-3 in 2OT. WPG generated the better chances (70% of the expected goals), but NSH found a way. J. Saros (NSH) was the difference in net, +1.7 goals saved above expected.
Win Probability
Live chance of winning from the game state - score, time, strength
Pre-game projection: NSH 40% · WPG 60%
Key Moments
- P1 13:02NSHgoal · 1-0+17% WP
- P1 19:20WPGgoal · 1-1+18% WP
- P2 05:09WPGgoal · 1-2+20% WP
- P2 10:48NSHgoal · 2-2+20% WP
- P3 14:01NSHgoal · 3-2+40% WP
- P3 18:59WPGgoal · 3-3+33% WP
Deserve-to-Win
Share of expected goals (chance quality), against the actual score
Expected Goals - Cumulative
Who is earning the better chances over the game (goal ticks below)
Momentum
Rolling 5-minute share of expected goals - who is pressing
Scoring Chances by Danger
Chances by Score State
Expected goals (attempts) by the shooter's game state - where the chances came from
Goaltending - is the goalie stealing it?
GSAx = goals saved above expected (Forensic xG faced − goals against). Right of center = robbing the shooters; left = leaking.
NSH
Attempts
53
Shots
24
Goals
4
xG
2.06
WPG
Attempts
79
Shots
40
Goals
3
xG
4.72
Rink Shot Map
NHL rink coordinates / Forensic xG marker size
Five Minute Momentum
Pressure By Period
| Period | NSH Att | NSH xG | WPG Att | WPG xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Period | 13 | 0.84 | 19 | 1.82 |
| 2nd Period | 16 | 0.45 | 27 | 1.24 |
| 3rd Period | 15 | 0.38 | 22 | 1.17 |
| Overtime | 7 | 0.14 | 8 | 0.32 |
| 2OT | 2 | 0.26 | 3 | 0.18 |
Source: NHL play-by-play shot attempts with Forensic Hockey xG where enriched shot rows are available.