Winnipeg Jets at Utah Hockey Club
Overview Signals
Score
3-4
Final / OT
Shots
26-22
WPG / UTA
Power Play Goals
1-0
WPG / UTA
UTA Shot Edge
-4
Hits -11
The Story
UTA beat WPG 4-3 in overtime. UTA earned it, owning 61% of the chance quality. C. Hellebuyck (WPG) had a rough night, -1.7 goals saved above expected.
Win Probability
Live chance of winning from the game state - score, time, strength
Pre-game projection: WPG 49% · UTA 51%
Key Moments
- P1 05:20UTAgoal · 0-1+18% WP
- P1 09:31UTAgoal · 0-2+16% WP
- P2 03:01UTAgoal · 0-3+10% WP
- P3 15:23WPGgoal · 2-3+9% WP
- P3 15:48WPGgoal · 3-3+41% WP
- OT 00:13UTAgoal · 3-4+46% WP
Deserve-to-Win
Share of expected goals (chance quality), against the actual score
Expected Goals - Cumulative
Who is earning the better chances over the game (goal ticks below)
Momentum
Rolling 5-minute share of expected goals - who is pressing
Scoring Chances by Danger
Chances by Score State
Expected goals (attempts) by the shooter's game state - where the chances came from
Goaltending - is the goalie stealing it?
GSAx = goals saved above expected (Forensic xG faced − goals against). Right of center = robbing the shooters; left = leaking.
WPG
Attempts
55
Shots
26
Goals
3
xG
1.49
UTA
Attempts
52
Shots
22
Goals
4
xG
2.33
Rink Shot Map
NHL rink coordinates / Forensic xG marker size
Five Minute Momentum
Pressure By Period
| Period | WPG Att | WPG xG | UTA Att | UTA xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Period | 10 | 0.45 | 15 | 0.79 |
| 2nd Period | 24 | 0.39 | 23 | 0.59 |
| 3rd Period | 21 | 0.65 | 13 | 0.86 |
| Overtime | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.08 |
Source: NHL play-by-play shot attempts with Forensic Hockey xG where enriched shot rows are available.